MP Questions Anti-LGBTQ Bill Amendments

Member of Parliament for Assin South, John Ntim Fordjour, has voiced strong objections. He questions the alleged 31 amendments made to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill. Mr. Fordjour believes these changes significantly weaken the law. He argues the original intent of the bill is now diluted.

Mr. Fordjour expressed concern about specific exemptions. These exemptions affect lawyers, journalists, media, and healthcare workers. They are exempt from prosecution when acting within their professional duties. Mr. Fordjour stated the original bill did not intend to criminalize legitimate professional services. He clarified, "We never said nobody should counsel. We never said nobody should provide care. We said people should not use those platforms to promote or campaign for LGBTQ activities." He believes these exemptions create loopholes.

The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill is a major legislative effort. It follows Parliament's passage of the bill. This happened after the introduction of several amendments. The changes have sparked considerable debate. This debate involves supporters and opponents of the legislation. Mr. Fordjour was a key promoter of the original bill. He stated that professionals like doctors and lawyers do not need special protection. Their duties do not equate to advocacy for LGBTQ+ practices. A lawyer defending a client, or a doctor treating a patient, does not promote the client's or patient's condition. The bill aimed to stop promotion and organised campaigns for LGBTQ+ practices.

Mr. Fordjour's concerns highlight ongoing tensions. The bill has drawn praise from religious and cultural groups. It has also faced criticism from human rights advocates. International partners have also expressed reservations. The disagreement over these amendments is likely to continue. It will remain a significant issue as the bill moves forward. The potential for loopholes is a primary worry for many.