NDC Elder Denies Mahama Third-Term Agenda Talks

A member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Council of Elders, Christine Amoako-Nuamah, has rejected claims that her council met with President John Dramani Mahama to discuss an alleged bid for a third presidential term. She stated clearly that no such meeting occurred.

Dr. Amoako-Nuamah emphasized that she has no knowledge of any engagement between the Council of Elders and President Mahama regarding a third-term agenda. She described such reports as baseless and unfounded. The elder made her statements on Wednesday, June 3, responding to inquiries about a reported meeting.

The Council of Elders serves as an advisory body within the NDC. Its main role is to offer guidance and share experience when needed. The council does not have the power to prevent party leaders from pursuing their political ambitions. Dr. Amoako-Nuamah highlighted that elders have a responsibility to speak up on party matters. She questioned the value of elders who remain silent during difficult times.

“If you are home and something is going wrong and you cannot speak about it, then what kind of elder are you?” she asked. Dr. Amoako-Nuamah further explained that the council's purpose is not to block anyone's aspirations. This includes ambitions to contest the presidency. She stressed that the members bring decades of political experience to their advisory role.

“Nobody is trying to stop anybody, but we are a very experienced group of people. People who have been around for quite some time,” she added. These comments were made during an interview with Citi FM. The NDC Council of Elders focuses on providing counsel and direction based on collective experience.

The political landscape in Ghana often sees discussions around presidential term limits. The constitution generally limits a president to two four-year terms. Speculation about extending or circumventing these limits can arise, especially during periods of political transition or stability. Dr. Amoako-Nuamah's statements aim to bring clarity and dispel rumours circulating within the party and among the public. These rumours, if left unaddressed, could potentially influence public perception and internal party dynamics.